Ezeknek a kérdéseknek mi a helyes válasza angolból?

Which statement is not true of finite subordination?

1. Main clause and the subordinate clause are non reversable.

2. The main clause and the subordinate clause do not have to be of the same type of syntactic type.

3. The subordinate clause forms a constituent with the subordinator.

4. No expression can move from the subordinate clause to the main clause.

What is the problem with: She could has gone there.

Jó az a válasz rá, hogy:The perfect auxiliary is in finite form?

Modal auxiliary verbs in English?

1. have the NICE (negation, inversion, code, emphasis) properties

2. express different types of possibilities or necessities

(szerintem itt mint kettő jó, vagy nem?)

Is "Cate could do this" sentence has both past and present tense reading?

If John left England before they had charged him with murder...

1. john left the country

2.they did not charge him with mureder while he was in England

Not wanting to meet Kate, I left the room

1.there is a gerund

2. there is an infinitive

3. there are 2 objects

4. there is one finite verb form

An English verb taking suffix- ed can function as a(n)

1. past tense form

2. participle

(itt azért lenne talán az első, mert a 2.-ban nem "participle form")

Verbs in English

1. take the suffix -s in present tense if the subject is 3SG

2. have past tense

A verbal complex in English

1.contain one lexical verb

2. may contain more than one finite forms

3. my include several auxiliaries

4.may occur either in main or in subordinate clauses

John gave a present to Kate on Tuesday

1. contains on PP

2. contains a VP-modifier (ez micsoda?)

3.contains an object

4. contains a verbal predicate