Trianon többek között azért is következett be, mert túl liberálisan bántunk a kisebbségekkel? Kemény kézzel azaz nyugat-európai módszerekkel (ZÉRÓ TOLERANCIA) kellett volna kezelni őket?
Tehát nyugati módszerekkel, büntetőjoggal alaposan megtámogatva (mint Anglia Francia o. Dánia Svédország, Hollandia Németország Norvégia Dánia) kellett volna a helyzetet kezelni?
A világ első kisebbségi jogokat deklaráló törvénye Magyarországon született meg 1849-ben (később 1868-ban), ezt követte Ausztria 1867-ben, majd Belgium 1898-ban. Az első világháború előtti Európában csak ezen három országban született törvény a kisebbségi jogokról, más európai országok jogrendszerei tiltották és büntetni rendelték a kisebbségi nyelvek használatát az általános iskolákban, kulturális intézményekben, a közigazgatásban, az igazságszolgáltatásban, és a sajtóban is.[2]
Tévedés. Nem az OMM-et darabolták fel mivel ilyen állam hivatalosan nem volt, felségterülete sem volt Bosznián kívül. Két ország szövetsége volt az OMM
Javaslom művelődj:
Terms
Under the Compromise:
The old historic constitution of Hungary was restored.
The Hungarian parliament was re-established (which had been the supreme legislative power in Hungary since the 12th century), as it was before 1849. Each part of the Monarchy had its own government, headed by its own prime minister. The "dual monarchy" consisted of the Emperor-King, and the common ministers of foreign affairs, defence, and a finance ministry only for expenditures of the Common Army, navy and diplomatic service.
The Hungarian legal system and Hungarian laws were restored in the territory of the Kingdom of Hungary.[45] During the negotiations of the compromise, even the April Laws of the Hungarian revolutionary parliament (with the exception of the laws based on the 9th and 10th points) were also accepted by the monarch.
The traditionally independent and separate judicial system of Hungary was restored.
Austria–Hungary, as a common entity, had no jurisdiction and legislative power, which was shaped by the fact that there was no common parliament. The common diplomatic and military affairs were managed by delegations from the Imperial Council and the Hungarian parliament. The delegations had 60 members from the Imperial Council, and 60 members from the Hungarian parliament, and the ratios of various political fractions exactly and proportionally mirrored their own political parties of their parliaments. The members of the delegations from the two parliaments had no right to give speeches, to debate, or introduce new ideas during the meetings; thus they were nothing more than the extended arms of their own parliaments. The only function of the delegates was to cast their votes according to the previously made decisions of their political factions in the Austrian and the Hungarian parliaments. All common decisions had to be ratified by the Austrian parliament to be valid on Austrian territory, and by the Hungarian parliament to be valid on the territory of Kingdom of Hungary.[46] The Austrian and Hungarian delegations hold their joint meeting in Vienna in every odd year, and in Pest in every even year.
With the exception of the territory of Bosnia, Austria-Hungary had no common sovereign territory in international law. (Ie. Kingdom of Hungary and Empire of Austria were different countries) Thus regarding to territorial changes during peace treaties, the Empire of Austria and Kingdom of Hungary had to act independently as independent countries: A delegate from the Austrian parliament had right to sign peace treaties related to territorial changes of the Austrian Empire, and respectively, a delegate from the Hungarian parliament had right to sign peace treaties regarding to territorial changes of the Kingdom of Hungary.[47] See: Treaty of Saint-Germain and Treaty of Trianon
A common Ministry of Foreign Affairs was created, responsible for diplomacy and foreign policy. Further information: Foreign Ministry of Austria-Hungary
There was no common citizenship in Austria–Hungary: one was either an Austrian citizen or a Hungarian citizen, never both.[48] Austria–Hungary used two separate passports: the Austrian passport and the Hungarian one. There was no common passport.[49]
A common finance ministry was founded, only for the expenditures of the Common Army, the navy and the diplomatic service and for the issue of banknotes. It was headed by the Common Finance Minister. All other expenditures belonged to the Austrian Finance Ministry in the Austrian Empire and the Hungarian Finance Ministry in the Kingdom of Hungary. The Austrian finance minister was subordinated only to the Minister-President of Austria in the Austrian Empire, and the Hungarian Finance Minister was subordinated only to the Prime Minister of Hungary.
The monetary and economic terms of the Compromise and the customs union had to be renegotiated every ten years.
Despite Austria and Hungary sharing a common currency, they were fiscally sovereign and independent entities.[50]
The international commercial treaties and trade agreements were conducted independently by Austria and Hungary, as independent nations.[51] The Common Finance Ministry had no competence in the international commercial treaties and trade agreements of the Austrian state or the Hungarian state.
The Royal Hungarian Honvéd was restored, and the Imperial-Royal Landwehr was created, but both states had to continue to finance the Austro-Hungarian Common Army, much larger than both. A common Austro-Hungarian War Ministry was formed immediately for the large Common Army, but it had no right to command directly the smaller Austrian Landwehr and the Hungarian Honvéd armies, which were respectively placed under the direct control of the separate Austrian and Hungarian Ministries of Defence. The Austrian and Hungarian Ministers of Defence were not placed under the command and jurisdiction of the Common War Ministry; they were subordinated only to their own prime ministers and the respective parliaments in Vienna and Budapest.[52] Further information: Imperial and Royal Ministry of War
Hungary took on a large part of the towering Austrian state debt.[53]
The Emperor-King held all authority over the structure, organization, and administration of the army. He appointed the senior officials, had the right to declare war, and was the commander-in-chief of the army.
The Emperor-King had the right to declare a state of emergency.
The Emperor-King had the right of preliminary royal assent to every bill the Cabinet Council wanted to report to the National Assembly. He had the right to veto any law passed by the National Assembly.
The Emperor-King had the right to dissolve the National Assembly and of the declaration of new parliamentary elections.
The Emperor-King had the right to appoint and dismiss the members of the Cabinet Council.
The power of the monarch significantly increased in a comparison with the pre-1848 status of Hungary. This meant a great reduction in Hungarian sovereignty and autonomy, even in comparison with the pre-1848 status quo.
ITT A LÉNYEG:
With the exception of the territory of Bosnia, Austria-Hungary had no common sovereign territory in international law. (Ie. Kingdom of Hungary and Empire of Austria were different countries) Thus regarding to territorial changes during peace treaties, the Empire of Austria and Kingdom of Hungary had to act independently as independent countries: A delegate from the Austrian parliament had right to sign peace treaties related to territorial changes of the Austrian Empire, and respectively, a delegate from the Hungarian parliament had right to sign peace treaties regarding to territorial changes of the Kingdom of Hungary.[47]
Ne keverjük a szezont a fazonnal. A franciák nagyrészt rokonnépeket franciásítottak, akiknek a nyelve sokszor még érthető is volt franciával, például az okkitán. Sokkal kevesebb erőfeszítés volt egy ilyet lebonyolítani, mint amit a magyarok próbáltak. Annak a megfelelője, amit a franciák csináltak az lett volna, ha mondjuk a székelyek nem akarnak egyesülni és őket kellett volna "magyarosítani". A németeknél ugyanez volt. A franciáktól távol álló bretonok, baszkok pedig jelentéktlen számban voltak jelen a franciákkal szemben.
Az angolok közel 1000 évig próbálták angolosítani a keltákat és így sem jártak teljes sikerrel. A magyarok 50 év alatt sehogy sem tudták volna elmagyarosítani a tőlük ennyire külömböző szlávokat, románokat.
Mik azok a rokonnépek? Ezek a nyelvek legtöbb esetben annyira voltak nyelvrokonok mint az angol a németnek, vagy egyáltalán nem voltak rokon nyelvek. Tehát a másik nyelvének megtanulása nélkül nem értették meg egymást.
In the era of the Great French revolution, only 25% of the population of Kingdom of France could speak the French language as mothertongue. But even in 1870, France was still similar-degree multi-ethnic state as Hungary, only 50% of the population of France spoke the French language as mothertongue. The other half of the population spoke Occitan, Breton, Provençal, Catalan, Corsican, Alsatian, West Flemish, Lorraine Franconian, Gallo, Picard or Ch’timi and Arpitan etc... Many minority languages were closer to Spanish languages or Italian language than French) French governments banned minority language schools, minority language newspapers minority theaters. They banned the usage of minority languages in offices , public administration, and judiciary procedures. The ratio of french mothertongue increased from 50% to 91% during the 1870-1910 period.
"Mik azok a rokonnépek? Ezek a nyelvek legtöbb esetben annyira voltak nyelvrokonok mint az angol a németnek, vagy egyáltalán nem voltak rokon nyelvek. Tehát a másik nyelvének megtanulása nélkül nem értették meg egymást."
Amint mondtam, sok esetben tanulás nélkül tudtak egymással kommunikálni (ez nem azt jelenti, hogy beszéltek franciául, hanem megértetni a mondanivalójukat), de a példád mentén megtanulni is könnyebb egy németnek angolul, mint mondjuk magyarul. Tehát ez csak részletkérdés, mert tagadhatatlan, hogy ezek a nyelvek nagyon közel álltak egymáshoz a Magyar királyság helyzetével összehasonlítva. A beidézett szöveged is csak megerősíti ezt. Mert ha a spanyolhoz közelebb lévő nyelvekről is beszélünk, az még mindig az újlatin kategória.
Kapcsolódó kérdések:
Minden jog fenntartva © 2024, www.gyakorikerdesek.hu
GYIK | Szabályzat | Jogi nyilatkozat | Adatvédelem | Cookie beállítások | WebMinute Kft. | Facebook | Kapcsolat: info(kukac)gyakorikerdesek.hu
Ha kifogással szeretne élni valamely tartalommal kapcsolatban, kérjük jelezze e-mailes elérhetőségünkön!