Össze tudná nekem valaki foglalni Paul Ricoeur 3-as mimézis gondolatát?

"Paul Ricoeur (1913–2005) was a French philosopher whose main works on the interface between society text involved the speaker (writer), the listener (reader), and the outcome of these activities in the time and

space of the world we inhabit (Pellauer & Dauenhauer, 2016). Among his main works was the trilogy Time and

Narrative I–III, where he elaborates our narrative identity, evolving in a threefold mimesis in time (Ricoeur,

1984). Based on Poetics by Aristotle, he differentiates between three forms of mimesis. Mimesis may be defined

as imitation or representation, and mimetic activity organizes events by emplotment (Ricoeur, 1984).

Ricoeur works out his literature theories by analyzing written narratives (Ricoeur, 1984), but he also

addresses history with his theory of triple mimesis. The historian Haydon White (1999) takes this double

address further in a discussion about which narratives may not be told at a particular time, giving the holocaust

as an example, and using the triple mimesis theory as an analytical tool. Thereby, both Ricoeur and White have

used the mimesis theory for elucidating historical events.

However, the dynamics of the mimesis theory make it particularly well-suited for the analysis of real-time

events. This requires the possibility of an equal transfer from the written novel to the living dialogues of the IP

team‘s interpersonal and intrapersonal verbal and nonverbal exchanges. The written narrative is made living

through the analysis by Ricoeur, while our research on the interdiscursive IP learning is made more rigorous

through our analysis of the learners‘ interprofessional living exchange. This is the pivot point of this article;

that the resulting theoretical interface between life and novel justifies the use of literary concepts to analyze

learning processes in IP teams, just as White used the same theory to discuss historical events."

[link]