Mi történik akkor, ha skizofréniára szedek gyógyszert, de valójában nem is vagyok skizofréniás?

"pont most tanultam erről, pszichológus vagyok"

Ha tényleg pszichológus lennél, akkor nem "pont most" tanultál volna erről, hanem még egyetemista korodban. Tehát legjobb esetben pszichológusnak tanulsz. Még nem vagy az.

Kérdező, így olvasd, amit ír.

Kapur, S. (2003). Psychosis as a state of aberrant salience: a framework linking biology, phenomenology, and pharmacology in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 160, 13-23.

"While the newer “atypical” antipsychotics

are better tolerated, antipsychotics as a class are

associated with an element of “dysphoria” or a “deficit-like

state”"

"Laborit and Huguenard (116) reported

in 1951 that patients given these drugs showed désintéressement

in their surroundings even in the absence of

any sedation, while Delay et al. (117) observed in 1952 an

état d’indifférence resembling in this respect the effects of

lobotomy, which was prevalent in those times. This concept

was captured by others, who have used terms such as

“psychic indifference” (E. Meurice, unpublished article,

2000), “distanciating agents”(118), and “emotional restriction”

(119)."

"Neither normal volunteers nor patients find antipsychotics

pleasant; in both populations they are associated with a plethora of unpleasant subjective effects, captured

under the rubric of “neuroleptic-induced dysphoria,” “decreased

motivational drive,” or “neuroleptic-induced deficit

state. These side effects may be the

other edge of the fundamental mechanism of antipsychotics—

dampened salience. A high salience of the objects

and ideas that one loves and desires is the important force

that drives humans and their social interactions”