A "should"-nak hogy van a múlt ideje?

A should a shall segédige múlt idejű alakja...

You shouldn't have to go there

Első válaszoló nem jól tudja!

A should nem múlt idejű alak...azt jelenteni: kellene

A múlt idejű alak pedig a should have +ige 3.alakja

Az utolsó kérdésre a válasz: I shouldn't have gone there

Első vagyok.

Tényleg rosszul írtam. Nem akartak félrevezetni, elnézést kérek.

(jól le lettem miatta pontozva:( )

De, ha úgy vesszük, akkor a "múlt idejű" alakja.

will -> would

can -> could

shall -> should, stb.

bocsi, de most lusta vagyok fordítani, ha nem érted, szólj, majd holnap akkor kifejtem

'Should' is etmologically the past tense of 'shall' but in practice does not function as an independent past tense: that is to say, a main clause predicated by 'should' has either present or future reference, but not past.

The formal connection between 'shall' and 'should' is evident only in the context of reported speech, so that e.g. the statement

"I shall be here at seven tomorrow."

could (in BrE, at least) be reported as

"I told her that I should be there at seven the following day."

(AmE speakers, however - and indeed many contemporary BrE speakers -would prefer 'would' here.)

Within a main clause , 'should' functions both as a DEONTIC modal, with the meaning '(have) a duty to/(be) obliged to', as in

"You should always handle antiques with care."

and as an EPISTEMIC modal, with the meaning 'can logically be expected to', as in

"His train has just arrived; so he should be here somewhere."

Ezzel nekem is volt némi problémám.

Ha azt kérdezem "mit kellett volna tennem" akkor helyes így: "What should I have done"?